TECHNICAL APPENDIX D

INDICATORS FOR MEETING MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES--SUMMARY AND RATIONALE MATRICES


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the U.S. Geological Survey initiated discussions on water-monitoring activities in April 1991; the identification of pervasive problems associated with monitoring resulted in formation of the Intergovernmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality (ITFM). The ITFM, which was mandated by an Office of Management and Budget directive to strengthen coordination for water information nationwide, began work in January 1992. It comprises 20 representatives of Federal, State, and interstate governmental groups. In addition, nearly 150 Federal and State staff sit on the following task groups: Intergovernmental Framework, Data Management and Information Sharing, Data Collection Methods, Environmental Indicators, and Assessment and Reporting. This document represents one of the work products of the Indicators Task Group. The following paragraphs describe the structure of the matrix.

In the attached tables, categories of indicators for monitoring water-resource quality, as well as uses and management objectives, are listed and prioritized. The indicators are meant to describe the suitability of the water-resource use by management objective, not the effect of a usage on a water resource. Table 1 is a summary matrix of indicator groups versus categories of management objectives and presents an overview of appropriate usage. Table 2, which provides a brief rationale for the use of the indicator type, expands the information in table 1. All water-resource groups are addressed by the matrix--streams and rivers, lakes and reservoirs, wetlands, estuaries, coastal waters, and the Great Lakes. An indicator or indicator type, which has been identified as having priority, may not be applicable to the entire spectrum of water-body types. Specifically, different individual indicators are more important for evaluation of some water-body types than others.


Table 1. Summary matrix of recommended environmental indicators for meeting management objectives for status and trends of surface waters (summary matrix).
Table 2. Rationale for use of indicators in water-resource-quality-monitoring programs for meeting water-management objectives relevant to selected surface-water uses. These are status and trends indicators meant to illustrate the suitability of a water resource for use by a management objective rather than demonstrate the effects of a particular management objective on that water resources--page 1

Table 2. Page 2

Table 2. Page 3

Table 2. Page 4

Table 2. Page 5

Table 2. Page 6

Table 2. Page 7

Table 2. Page 8


Watershed-level indicators are treated differently from the other indicators. For these indicators, recommendations on priority are not given. Because much of this information changes slowly, data are collected once or infrequently during the course of a monitoring program. This background information is needed for interpretation of data from the other indicators.

Environmental indicators are a valuable tool for detecting problems and identifying causal relations. They allow management decisions to be made related to the protection of water-resource quality.

Three broad categories of environmental indicators--human health, ecological health, and economic concerns--are related to six water uses that represent specific management objectives. These management objectives are analogous to the "designated uses" that States set in their water-quality standards and report to the USEPA as part of the 305(b) program. The term "management objectives" is more broadly applicable to the interests of the numerous agencies and offices involved in the ITFM process. Within the broad areas of human health, ecological health, or economic concerns, the six categories of management objectives include three for human health--consumption of fish, shellfish, and wildlife; public water supply and food processing; and recreation (boating and swimming). Ecological health management objectives considered are in the context of aquatic and semiaquatic life, protected species, and aquaculture and recreation (fishing and catchability). For economic concerns, management objectives are industry (makeup and cooling water), transportation and hydropower, and agriculture and forestry.

Indicator categories are broad areas of environmental information that can encompass many specific measures related to those categories. For example, specific measures within the macroinvertebrate category can be derived from assemblage, community, population data, and lethal and sublethal toxicity data. Other biological indicator categories are fish, semiaquatic wildlife, pathogens and fecal indicator organisms, phytoplankton, periphyton, aquatic and semiaquatic plants, and zooplankton.

The category "chemical exposure/water chemistry" includes oxidative state, ionic strength, nutrients, potentially hazardous chemicals in water, sediment, and organismal tissue/bioaccumulation. Indicator categories related to physical habitat include water quantity, water temperature, suspended sediment/turbidity, bed sediment and substrate, geomorphology, and riparian vegetation. Watershed-level stressors refer to factors that are often large scale and, in some cases, change at a different temporal scale than the other categories. Generally, these stressors are extrinsic to the aquatic system and include land-use patterns; vegetative cover; loading or application of chemical, sewage, or animal wastes; acid deposition; reaeration potential; channel or flow modification; sedimentary indicators; and location.


Return to ITFM Report Appendixes Table of Contents

Please e-mail comments to lkendrix@usgs.gov
Last modified: Fri Nov 1 17:33:11 1996