
* Participated in part of the meeting via teleconference line |
Tues am: LeAnne, Jerry & Ed met and discussed the WQDE tool to be developed (see WQDE workgroup notes).
Wed am: Eric, Dan, Ed, Charlie, Cliff, Merle, James met and discussed delegation of effort. Merle suggested we contact Greg Cottrell, former Board member, to help with the Outreach effort.
Web site update & maintenance
List of action items: Web site has been moribund for some time and there is a fair amount of work to be done. Ed and Dan will get together ahead of scheduled workgroup meeting to develop a list of suggested priorities.
Links that go to a page with minimal “space-saver” content should be removed until content is developed. Discuss which links are candidates for removal and which links might be combined with others to make a more coherent whole.
ABOUT section:
TOOLS section:
Drop New Technologies tool pending copy from Katherine and Ed.
STRATEGY section:
Keep all but develop content as described in the strategy section below.
NEWS section:
A . “What's New?” could include a sentence or two about:
B. “Success Stories” could include excerpts from emails etc. praising NEMI, examples of agencies or organizations adopting of the data elements, etc. etc. (EPA, California-Revital….others…)
Workgroups pages
Discuss with individual workgroup leads how to populate/update their respective pages.
Action : Eric will talk with workgroup chairs and seek new or revised web content for the "ABOUT" section, particularly from the Nutrients, and New Technology workgroup chairs.
Strategy section
Need to develop a plan with tasks and timelines to populate this section more completely, or else decide that it's too ambitious an undertaking at this point and reorganize.
Action : Dan will continue to develop the “STRATEGY” section of the website. The approach will involve replacing the current Board strategy table with the simpler strategy table found in the Fact Sheet: The value of Data Comparability . This simpler table will have four links, one for each of the four elements. The links will go to four separate pages that develop the concept of that element in the context of the NWQMC framework. These four strategy/framework pages will contain links to the TOOLS page(s) and/or other Board products relevant to that strategy/framework element.
Other issues discussed (including, but not limited to…ideas for future projects, issues to bring before full Board, linkages/connections to other workgroups, ideas for new members)
Action : Ed Johnson will take the lead on the “TOOLS” section of the web site and work with:
1) LeAnne to develop the WQDE tool
2) Katherine to develop a New Tech tool
Power Point Presentations from Loveland that might be included on the external or internal web sites:
Any between meeting conference calls planned?
Ed, LeAnne and Revital will work to develop at KASH (kick Ass Spread Sheet) of data elements for download and perhaps a PDA product.
Ed and Katherine will work on New Technology
Dan, Eric and Ed should conference in a month or two to discuss progress.
Other comments/notes/issues
If PBS and Nutrient workgroups merging do we still want to keep them as separate workgoups on the website (ABOUT section)? I think yes …
Can the mailing list for “Across the Board” me made available on the internal web site (or elsewhere) so that Board members can make sure it is current? (Ed Johnson's request).
The bottom line …. Eric will take the lead on website ACTION section, Ed J. will take the lead on website TOOLS section, and Dan will take the lead on website STRATEGY section. I propose the three of us conference in a month or so to discuss progress
Other Outreach needs: Coastal Zone 2005 (July 17-21, 05 New Orleans ); Ed Johnson will be attending and could use this opportunity to engage & inform the coastal zone community about the Board and the Council.
Others…?
| Source | Analyte class | Instrumentation | Total # in NEMI |
| USGS | Nutrients | ICP | 2 |
| EPA | Pesticides | GC-MS | 5 |
| etc | etc | etc | etc |
Spent the time reviewing the methods that are already in the staging area (invert collection and a variety of toxicity methods) and discussed how the display/fields need to be modified for this type of method. Dan stressed that it would sure be nice if several types of methods/protocols could share the same query/display (i.e., water-sample collection same as invertebrate collection, etc.). Group decided it was worth a try.
ACTION 1: Dan will modify the display.
ACTION 2: Field activities committee will try to find outside reviewers to provide input.
How to connect protocols to lab methods? This is a question numerous groups have wrestled with, including STORET and NWIS.
Need to update the FAC roster. Current members: Ed Santoro, Franceska Wilde, Dan Sullivan, Eric Vowinkel, Karen Blocksom.
WORKGROUP CHAIR: LeAnne Astin
MEETING PARTICIPANTS: Eric Volwinkle, Herb Brass, Erich Emory, Chuck Spooner, Revital Katznelson, Ed Johnson, Jerry Diamond, Karen Blocksom, Larry Keith, Ed Santoro, Charlie Peters, Franceska Wilde
WHO WAS ON THE PHONE: No call-ins
1. Are there any new workgroup members or guests we need to add to mailing list?
-- Erich Emory, New member, ORSANCO, emery@orsanco.org
-- Revital Katznelson, New member, (CA) State Water Resources Control Board,Rk@rb2.swrcb.ca.gov
-- Karen Blocksom, Guest/New member?,US EPA, blocksom.karen@epa.gov
2. Status of workgroup projects, activities, products
Biological WQDEs
Timeline for ACWI approval of bio/tox data elements and guidance document was discussed. Jerry agreed to delete confusing table in guidance doc. Document must be seen by both Board and NWQMC before submitting to ACWI. Chuck Spooner to inquire re: funding for wider publication of guidance doc following approval.
Revised timeline:
2-YEAR WORKPLAN
Completion of the physical habitat data elements remains a goal; other lists are still in limbo at this time. Group need to discuss these further via conference calls.
"Clearing house" of links from our web site to other examples of good data mgt. using the data elements (e.g. Revital's Field Road Map, Curtis Cude's Pacific Data Exchange). Ed J. and Jerry Diamond offered several suggestions. Needs more discussion
There was much discussion of the increased use of the web site as a "vehicle for communicating our products and services"...to promote WQDEs & offer online tools for implementation (e.g. printable and/or
downloadable field forms, pick lists, PDA applications) w/emphasis on
their "customizability." Excel appears to have promise as a development
platform: readily understood, simpler to work with than databases,
relatively easy to customize with minimal IT skills. Drawback:
conversion to Pocket Excel wipes out most custom options, macros,
charts, pivot tables etc.. However, technology is catching up (Flash
memory etc.), PDAs will soon be able to run full versions of Excel.
Chuck S. pointed out that "our" pick lists should converge w/NEMI's for
consistency; and that we should be thinking about getting state
monitoring councils on board. Revital gave PowerPoint presentation and
demonstration of the Field Road map, an Excel app based on the data
elements & developed for managing citizen monitoring info. LeAnne with
Revital to explore adaptation of Field Road map concept as a data
elements tool. Further discussion is needed to set priorities &
establish next steps...what would we like to have for the next National
Monitoring Conference? LeAnne to schedule additional conference calls so
that worksgroup can discuss activities & products in more detail.
Anyone have notes?
Chuck Spooner, EPA
Overview of GAO report. Bottom line, data management is done poorly and they recommend that a single entity be appointed to recommend changes and coordinate. Army Corps has offered to do it, GAO report recommends that the National Water Quality Monitoring Council do it.
U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy -- started by Act of Congress -- deals with shoreline and off-shoreline issues (huge compendium). Chapter 15 deals w/ monitoring. Major recommendations in report:
15-1. U.S. needs a national monitoring program (NOAA, USGS, EPA to lead)
15-2. Global earth-observing system
15-3. Monitoring network has clear goals, specific core variables, etc.
EPA's Wadeable Streams Assessment. Laura Gabanski gave presentation on what it is, where Board can help.
1. Overall workgroup meeting information |
|
NAME OF WORKGROUP |
Biology |
MEETING LOCATION/DATE |
Hach Co., Fort Collins , CO - 10/27/04 |
WORKGROUP CHAIR |
Jerry Diamond interim |
MEETING PARTICIPANTS (add members in a list separated by commas) |
Bob Dorazio, Roy Irwin, Laura Gabanski, Karen Blocksom, Herb Brass, Todd Harris, Pat Anderson, Ed Santoro, Jerry Diamond, Bernie Malo, Erich Emery, Merle Shockey, Katherine Alben |
WHO WAS ON THE PHONE |
Sam Stribling |
2. Are there any new workgroup members or guests we need to add to mailing list? If yes, add them to the table below. ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
|||
NAME, AFFILIATION |
GUEST OR NEW MEMBER |
EMAIL ADDRESS |
PHONE |
Bob Dorazio |
new |
bob_dorazio@usgs.gov |
|
Roy Irwin |
new |
Roy_Irwin@nps.gov |
|
3. Status of workgroup projects, activities, products ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
||
AGENDA ITEM |
CURRENT STATUS |
NEXT STEPS AND ACTION ITEMS |
EPA-Board bioassessment comparability tasks |
Board initiated some of these tasks already (compilation of past studies, beginning guidance); need to dovetail with EPA needs |
Laura and Jerry will draft tasks and schedule and distribute to workgroup; link web site to EPA WSA and visa versa; develop structure of Board oversight group for tasks; Herb will check with Toni re: FACA issues; schedule call following core group assignment |
Bio methods in NEMI |
Several methods in staging area but need to be modified pending query structure |
Query structure agreed on; Dan will address search table in NEMI and determine additional modifications necessary to method input forms, if any |
Bio comparability workshop at NWQMC 2004 |
Workshop presented and feedback good; summary incorporated in Intro to guidance document |
Distribute draft to Bio workgroup for comments and suggestions |
|
|
|
4. Other issues discussed (including, but not limited to…ideas for future projects, issues to bring before full Board, linkages/connections to other workgroups, ideas for new members)
5. Outreach needs |
|
Are there products for which you need help finding publication outlets? |
no |
Are there products you need help distributing? |
no |
Any upcoming conferences that require an outreach effort? |
no |
6. Workgroup housekeeping issues |
|
External and Internal website, workgroup page comments/changes? |
Need to update some links and info re: EPA WSA and need for comparability tasks; upload Diamond presentation to SWPBA, Nov 2004 on bioassessment performance and comparability; upload slides from Bio workshop at NWQMC 2004 |
Board information packet, any items for inclusion |
no |
Workgroup email list, updates to current list? |
done |
Workgroup bibliography, updates (articles, presentations, abstracts, proceedings, reports, etc)? |
Need to do |
7. Plans for the next meeting
8. Any between meeting conference calls planned?
Yes, in December to discuss formation of Board-EPA workgroup for bioassessment comparability tasks
9. Other comments/notes/issues
1. Overall workgroup meeting information |
|
NAME OF WORKGROUP |
Outreach |
MEETING LOCATION/DATE |
Hach HQ. Fort Collins, Co. |
WORKGROUP CHAIR |
Eric Vowinkel, Ed Johnson |
MEETING PARTICIPANTS (add members in a list separated by commas) |
Eric Vowinkel, Ed Johnson, Dan Sullivan, Charlie Peters, Cary Jackson
|
WHO WAS ON THE PHONE |
None |
2. Are there any new workgroup members or guests we need to add to mailing list? If yes, add them to the table below. ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
|||
AFFILIATION (see attached sheet A)
|
GUEST OR NEW MEMBER |
EMAIL ADDRESS |
PHONE |
Will be working on this over the next month |
|
|
|
3. Status of workgroup projects, activities, products ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
||
AGENDA ITEM |
CURRENT STATUS |
NEXT STEPS AND ACTION ITEMS |
Newsletter, "Across the Board" to be published twice a year—March and September |
4 newsletters published to date. Need to begin next version. |
Solicit items for next ATB—several suggestions made at the Oct. 05 meeting. Have draft of next version of ATB ready for Mar. 2005 MDCB Meeting in FL. |
Develop target mailings lists for outreach to others |
Have not been identifed |
Come up with strategy to improve outreach by March '05 meeting |
Update member rosters |
Out of date |
Have updates to member rosters to Dan Sullivan by 11/23/04. Have web page updated by March 2005 meeting. |
Keep MDCB webpage up to date |
On-going. Many suggestions made at October 2005 meeting. |
Use October meeting notes and requests from Work Group Chairs to identify and prioritize webpage updates. Obtain copies of powerpoint presentations from Oct. Meeting and place on webpage. |
Improve communications between Outreach Co-Chair and other work groups Chairs |
Not routine |
Request updates from Work Group Co-Chairs quarterly. |
Look into possible IMPACT publication prior to the NWQMC meeting in San Jose |
Begin planning process-Charlie Peters developed a first cut outline of possible topics at Oct. MDCB meeting |
Contact AWRA personnel about possible special issue by 11/30/04 Expand outline and contact potential authors by 12/31/04 Develop timetable for reports by 03/05 meeting in FL. Submit reports for review by deadline determined by IMPACT. |
4. Other issues discussed (including, but not limited to…ideas for future projects, issues to bring before full Board, linkages/connections to other workgroups, ideas for new members)
Bring Hypoxia in Gulf of Mexico Issue to Full Board.
5. Outreach needs |
|
Are there products for which you need help finding publication outlets? |
We plan to ask AWRA IMPACT for a special edition of the MDCB Work Groups before the 2006 NWQMC . |
Are there products you need help distributing? |
We need to develop emailing lists for the ATB publication and other outreach materials |
Any upcoming conferences that require an outreach effort? |
|
6. Workgroup housekeeping issues |
|
External and Internal website, workgroup page comments/changes? |
Edits to External & internal site by end of December 2004 |
Board information packet, any items for inclusion |
|
Workgroup email list, updates to current list? |
Yes, will make list by Dec. 31, 2004 |
Workgroup bibliography, updates (articles, presentations, abstracts, proceedings, reports, etc)? |
Need to keep powerpoint presentations made at meetings up to date on web. |
7. Plans for the next meeting: Provide Outreach Work Group update
8. Any between meeting conference calls planned? Yes, probably will set up monthly conference calls (Nov., Dec., Jan., Feb) to solicit ideas. All Work Group Chairs will be asked to participage.
9. Other comments/notes/issues: Most important products of the Outreach Work Group is the website and the Across the Board (ATB) newsletter. We need to keep the website current and to improve communications between the Outreach Work Groups and the other workgroups.
Attendees: Roy Irwin (Nat'l. Park Service), Karin Bogren (Hach), Lynn Egan (Hach), Charlie Patton (USGS), Miguel Molina (Hach), Karen Blocksom (EPA), Erich Emory (ORSANCO), Revital Katznelson (CA Water Board), Ed Santoro (Co-chair, DRBC), Cliff Annis (Co-chair, PAREXEL)
The PBS and Nutrients workgroups were consolidated into a single workgroup as of this meeting, and will be co-chaired by Ed Santoro (DRBC) and Cliff Annis (PAREXEL).
Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico was discussed as a matter for the Board.
ACTION: The PBS/Nutrients group will develop and draft a strategy.
Nitrate Reductase method was presented by Charlie Patton. Possible replacement for cadmium for nitrate determination.
Nitrate DQO paper: draft is almost finalized.
ACTION: Finalize and send to Council for comment.
Web site updates: by Dec. 2004
2-year workplan: draft plan.
ACTION: Complete by January 2005.
Data Integrity Issue
1. Overall workgroup meeting information |
|
NAME OF WORKGROUP |
New Technologies |
MEETING LOCATION/DATE |
Loveland , CO |
WORKGROUP CHAIR |
Katherine Alben, Eric Vowinkel |
MEETING PARTICIPANTS (add members in a list separated by commas) |
Eric Vowinkel, Merle Shockey, Ed Johnson, Ed Santoro, Charlie Peters |
WHO WAS ON THE PHONE |
Lisa Olsen - presentation |
2. Are there any new workgroup members or guests we need to add to mailing list? If yes, add them to the table below. ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
|||
NAME, AFFILIATION |
GUEST OR NEW MEMBER |
EMAIL ADDRESS |
PHONE |
Eli Greenbaum |
New member |
greenbaum@ornl.gov |
|
Lisa Olsen |
New member |
ldolsen@usgs.gov |
|
Dale Hoover |
Member? |
dhoover@axys.com |
|
Laurie Van Heukelem |
New member |
laurievh@hpl.umces.edu |
|
Martha Wells |
New member |
mjmwells@tntech.edu |
|
3. Status of workgroup projects, activities, products ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
||
AGENDA ITEM |
CURRENT STATUS |
NEXT STEPS AND ACTION ITEMS |
Presented by Lisa Olsen |
Incorporate into framework – devices for physical, chemical, biological monitoring |
|
Web site cleanup |
Format, content in development (tools page – clearinghouse for new technologies) |
Compile materials and email revisions to EdJ, Dan |
NEMI |
Immunoassay methods – 21 added |
More to go: approx 40 |
NEMI |
Chlorophyll and other algal pigments by diverse technologies (lab-based LC-MS; remote, insitu) |
Draft input for review and discussion |
NEMI |
Pharmaceuticals (USGS methods – LC-MS) |
Merle S. trying to find support |
|
|
|
4. Other issues discussed (including, but not limited to…ideas for future projects, issues to bring before full Board, linkages/connections to other workgroups, ideas for new members)
Comparability study – 4 methods, international round robin: H. Claustre ( France ), S. Hooker (NASA), L. Van Heukelem (U Md Horn Point),
J-F Berthon ( Italy ), R. Barlow (Horn Pt), J. Ras ( France ), H. Sessions
(Horn Point), C. Targa ( European Joint Research Center for Inland and
Marine Waters , Italy ), C. Thomas (Horn Point), D. van der Linde (South
Africa), J.-C Marty ( France ).
An intercomparison of HPLC phytoplankton pigment methods using in situ
samples: application to remote sensing and database activities.
Marine Chemistry 2004 85:41-61.
5. Outreach needs |
|
Are there products for which you need help finding publication outlets? |
No – website should suffice |
Are there products you need help distributing? |
No – website should suffice |
Any upcoming conferences that require an outreach effort? |
Erik and Eli – plans in progress? |
6. Workgroup housekeeping issues |
|
External and Internal website, workgroup page comments/changes? |
Presentations (6) are parked under Albany meeting – need to collect in one place for easy access to New Technologies |
Board information packet, any items for inclusion |
|
Workgroup email list, updates to current list? |
See above #2
|
Workgroup bibliography, updates (articles, presentations, abstracts, proceedings, reports, etc)? |
Will attach copy of Lisa Olsen's presentation
|
7. Plans for the next meeting
Update external website for comment on development of tools (clearinghouse with links?)
8. Any between meeting conference calls planned?
February: email exchanges, with discussions by phone as needed to work on revisions to website before March
9. Other comments/notes/issues
1. Overall workgroup meeting information |
|
NAME OF WORKGROUP |
Accreditation |
MEETING LOCATION/DATE |
Loveland , CO / Oct. 25-29, 2004 |
WORKGROUP CHAIR |
Merle Shockey |
MEETING PARTICIPANTS (add members in a list separated by commas) |
Herb Brass, Charlie Peters, Jon van Soestbergen, Barry Lesnik |
WHO WAS ON THE PHONE |
Lara Autry, Jack Krueger, RaeAnn Haynes. George Melvin |
2. Are there any new workgroup members or guests we need to add to mailing list? If yes, add them to the table below. ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
|||
NAME, AFFILIATION |
GUEST OR NEW MEMBER |
EMAIL ADDRESS |
PHONE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Status of workgroup projects, activities, products ( insert as many rows into the table as needed ) |
||
AGENDA ITEM |
CURRENT STATUS |
NEXT STEPS AND ACTION ITEMS |
LEP Presentation |
USGS has initiated a new Laboratory Evaluation Program using a performance based paradigm
|
This presentation was given to a joint meeting of the Accreditation and PBS/Nutrients workgroups. This process moves to a lab evaluation process dependent purely upon data. It will be the new process the USGS utilizes to evaluate labs providing data for USGS Water Quality Monitoring projects. |
Interaction with NELAC and INELA State Laboratory Accreditation |
This interaction, desired to ensure coordination and cooperation between the organizations was to some extent, occurring because of Bart Simmons membership with NELAC, INELA, and the MDCB. Now that he has left, we have a need to determine how and who will make that coordination happen. |
The majority of this meeting was spent discussing some of the difficulties the States feel they will have in implementing NELAP. Jack Krueger indicated that he felt a Federal Agency should be the accrediting authority. In response to this suggestion, Lara presented her view of the present state of NELAP and where EPA intends to go with NELAP. EPA feels that there is a need for an independent umbrella organization to manage NELAP and that EPA isn't walking away from NELAP but wishes to be a partner in the process. -A question came up concerning three EPA solicitations has offered on NELAP issues. Lara responded with the purposes of these solicitations. 1) promote training for lab accreditation, 2) foster standards development (INELA), and 3) get some additional technical support for the program. In a move towards self sufficiency, a grant proposal was issued for an administrator of the lab accreditation program. This is an attempt to find a viable group to accept resources to make the program operate efficiently. EPA intends to be a partner in this effort and will have a review Board. -Jack is concerned that NELAP will be privatized and feels that accreditation is a federal function. - There was a short discussion about the failure of the PT program, to which Lara agreed that it hasn't functioned well. - The issue of paying for certifications state to state and the high cost of this activity is an issue. It is apparent that costs can be very high, especially for small to medium sized labs. It is hoped that this will work itself out as the program matures. -The state people still feel a lack of confidence in the direction EPA is moving forward and are not sure that states will want to get onboard with NELAP. In response to this feeling, Lara indicated that there may be some open forum sessions (listening sessions) that states can participate in. -Jon stated that consistency of state accreditation programs is an issue and feels that the direction NELAP is moving is away from state consistency. -RaeAnn does feel that state to state can work and that the consistency will be getting better, hopefully in the next five years. -Merle, NELAP accreditation has been a great help to the USWGS National Water Quality Lab. - George feels that the comfort level for the future is fuzzy and is concerned about the costs for labs. -Interaction between MDCB and INELA. INELA and NELAC are separate organizations and ELAB is the link with the private sector. -Lara will be the Board's conduit to ELAB, INELA, and NELAC. |
Interactions with FEM |
Following presentations by FEM, there is a need to determine how we should interact with FEM. |
Accreditation was a topic at the last FEM meeting. An action team was formed at a high level within EPA to support accreditation. Herb serves as a liaison between the Board and FEM. |
Field Standards/Position Paper |
We have discussed this item a number of times, but have not managed to get anything substantial, moving. |
This issue was not discussed in any detail at this meeting. |
State Lab Accreditation Position Paper |
We have a draft outline for this paper, but haven't managed to get anything going on fleshing it out. We need either contract help, or/and, state representatives to help in this effort. |
The question was asked by Merle, ‘Why are we writing this paper, and do we need to continue?' The answer from the group was that, ‘Yes, we need to write the paper'. Jon has agreed to take the outline developed by Bart Simmons and the Federal Lab Accreditation White Paper and make a first cut at writing the paper. We are shooting for a draft prior to our next meeting in Feb or March. |
Develop 2 year strategy |
The last strategy plan was put together in January of 2003, so we are in need of an updated plan for the next two year period. |
Specific items that will be included in the new 2 year strategic plan include: State lab accreditation paper, field stds position paper, and updating the workgroups webpage information. |
4. Other issues discussed (including, but not limited to…ideas for future projects, issues to bring before full Board, linkages/connections to other workgroups, ideas for new members)
5. Outreach needs |
|
Are there products for which you need help finding publication outlets? |
no |
Are there products you need help distributing? |
no |
Any upcoming conferences that require an outreach effort? |
no |
6. Workgroup housekeeping issues |
|
External and Internal website, workgroup page comments/changes? |
This will be worked on. |
Board information packet, any items for inclusion |
no |
Workgroup email list, updates to current list? |
This needs to be finalized. |
Workgroup bibliography, updates (articles, presentations, abstracts, proceedings, reports, etc)? |
NA |
7. Plans for the next meeting
-Develop draft paper on state lab accreditation.
-Develop outline of activities for field stds position paper.
-Update webpage information.
8. Any between meeting conference calls planned?
Not yet, but this will happen.
9. Other comments/notes/issues
George Melvin ( Vermont ) managed to get the state legislature to require that all state labs be accredited. This is a significant accomplishment.