 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bioassessment Comparability
The Methods Board Advisory Group provides technical expertise on the following EPA projects:
- Wadeable Stream Assessment Comparability Study
- State of the Science Bioassessment Comparability
- EPA Guidance on Bioassessment Comparability
Published Articles:
- Performance of different bioassessment methods: comparable evaluations of biotic integrity from contrasting procedures (Herbst & Silldorff)
- Electrofishing in boatable waters: does sampling design affect bioassessment metrics (Flotemersch and Blocksom, 2005)
- A method for measuring the comparability of different sampling methods used in biological surveys: implications for data integration & synthesis (Cao, Hawkins, and Story, 2005)
- Comparison of macroinvertebrate sampling methods for nonwadeable streams (Blocksom and Flotemersch, 2005)
- Development and testing of biomonitoring tools for macroinvertebrates in Florida Streams (Fore, 2004)
- Measuring and controlling data quality in biological assemblage surveys with special reference to stream benthic macroinvertebrates (Cao, Hawkins, and Vinson, 2003)
- Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACS-type models (Ostermiller & Hawkins, 2003)
- Determining the quality of taxonomic data (Stribling, Moulton, and Lester, 2003)
- The Ohio EPA Bioassessment Comparability Project: a prelinimary assessment (Ohio EPA, 1996)