ID. ProjectName Info Source Issue Status Collected By s_Lineage Frequency Index Period No. of Stations Network Design Data Span - Start Data Span - Ending Nature of the Sample Compartment Monitored DQO Reference Parameters Code   Contact Sample Sites "Notes" Gear Description Data  (Format) Access / Availability Time Frame Access
  National Coastal Assessment National Coastal Condition Report II                          http://www.epa.gov/emap/nca/                      EMAP Staff Oxygen depletion
Nutrient Enrichment
Toxic chemicals
Sedimentation
Habitat condition
Ongoing EPA, NOAA, FWS, USGS   Periodic 1997-2000 Varies depending on resolution sought Representative samples 1997 Present Water quality, sediment quality, benthic condition, habitat condition, fish tissue contaminants. Coastal waters, largely estuaries, coastal wetlands, coral reefs, mangrove and kelp forests, seagrass meadows, and upwelling areas http://www.epa.gov/emap/nca/html/docs/c2k_qapp.pdf WQI: DO, chlorophyll a, N, P, clarity; SQI:  sediment toxicity, contaminants, TOC; BI:  community diversity, presence/abundance of pollution tolerant/sensitive species; CHI:  data from NWI 2002; FTCI:  chemical contamination in target fish/shellfish;       Project Manager for NCCRII:  Barry Burgan EPA Orgainzed by physiographic province to cover the NE Coast, SE Coast, Gulf Coast, West Coast, Great Lakes, Alaska, Hawaii, and Island territories The primary focus of the NCA is to monitor and document a set of environmental indicators to estimate the ecological condition of the coastal resources of the U. S. or its subregions (e.g., Gulf of Mexico or state waters); secondarily, The NCA is expected to serve as a proving ground to develop research indicators; and finally, to serve as a proving ground to demonstrate the utility of this approach   Web tables The NCA databse is at http://oaspub.epa.gov/coastal/coast.search Study cycles
  National Assessment of Beaches  EPA  http://oaspub.epa.gov/beacon/beacon_data.about_beacon#about Bacterial contamination Ongoing EPA, coastal and Great Lakes states    Yearly Update Swimming season ( varies) Growing. 37XX in 2003  Targeted 1999 Present contact information, monitoring and notification program information, general beach characteristics, advisory and closing data, location data  Coastal Ocean, Great Lakes See individual state quality Assurance plans Microbial counts     Rick Hoffmann'USEPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW - 4305T
Washington DC 20460,  T:202-566-0388, hoffmann.rick@epa.gov

Charles Kovatch. USEPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW - 4305T
Washington DC 20460, T:202-566-0399,  kovatch.charles@epa.gov 
Specified for each state-designated beach pulls data from 2 EPA databases, PRAWN and RAD   BEACON online application STORET Annual Update
  Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) EPA  http://www.epa.gov/emap/  PPT by  (#####) Ongoing EPA, States, Tribes, USGS   Usually annual Summer Varies index sites, indicators, remote sensing, geographic surveys Varied Ongoing biological indicators, watershed scale indicators, riparian indicators, biophysical indicators streams, lakes, wetlands, coastline, estuaries Extensive Library of Quality Assurance Plans fish tissue, fish assemblage, periphyton, macroinvertebrate assessment, physical habitat, water physio-chemical: nutrient, temp, alkalinity, turbidity, DO, heavy metals, salinity, depth, pH,      EMAP Director Mike McDonald, mcdonald.michael@epa.gov Unknown     600 peer reviewed EMAP Publications, STORET, 3 State Estuaries Reports, 2 EPA Regional Estuaries Reports, State of Pacific Estuaries Report publications, via internet, reports (#####)
  Wadable Streams Assessment http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/wsa/index.html Biotic Integrity
Nutrient Enrichment
Sedimentation
Habitat condition
Completed EPA, States, Contractors   Index visit:  Single visit, 6 hour study at each site June 2004-October 2004 1100 sites initially, future sample size will vary depending on resolution sought probability-based survey design that allows for inference of stream condition to entire population of streams Jun-04 Oct-04 biological, chemical, physical, and watershed conditions allowing results to be expressed at the Ecoregion Level II scale Freshwater - wadeable streams http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/wsa/index.html macroinvertebrates, quantitative physical habitat, water samples     EPA Susan Holdsworth, 202-566-1187, holdsworth.susan@epa.gov 500 report will focus on "populations" of streams at Ecoregion Level II,  individual stream data available in dataset   2005 National Summary Report STORET (Future) Data being assembled (8/05)
  Great Rivers Assessment http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/three_rivers/index.html                                     http://es.epa.gov/ncer/rfa/archive/grants/02/02greatbasin.html#SCOPE%20OF Nutrients, physical habitat, fish & benthic invertebrates, periphyton, phytoplankton & zooplankton communities, fish tissue contaminants, sediment toxicity Ongoing EPA, States, Tribes, Universities   2004 and 2005 summer 2004, summer 2005 (base assessment: 400 sites) stratified probability design; documents current conditions in WQ for Missouri, Mississippi, and Ohio Rivers Jul-04 Present measurements at randomly selected sites for representative data of large sections of the rivers Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio Rivers (#####) Grades or indicators of water quality, plants, insects, fish and other aquatic life and sediments at the bottom of the rivers     EPA Dr. David Bolgrien  218-529-5216  bolgrien.dave@epa.gov  Random sites in Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio Rivers A program to demonstrate methods for assessing and monitoring the ecological
condition of the Great Rivers in the central United States.
  (#####) (SWIM - present; STORET future) Report due in2008
  National Status & Trends Program - Mussel Watch NOAA Staff -   Chemical and biological contaminant trends in sediment and bivalve tissue Ongoing NOAA   Biennial Dec - March 280 sampling every other estuary every other year; relational database in development 1986 Present Mussel and Oyster Tissue, Fine-grained sediments every 10 years MRS,Est.,Outlets, NSCZ, GL Performance-based Quality Assurance PAHs,PCBs,pesticides,butyltin,trace and major elements,sediment grain size.     Gunnar Lauenstein (301) 713-3028 ext. 152 3 stations/site until 1992 The longest continuous contaminant monitoring program in U.S. coastal waters. The project analyzes chemical and biological contaminant trends in sediment and bivalve tissue collected at over 280 coastal sites from 1986 to present.Sampling every other estuary every other year; relational database in development   hard copy and computer file http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/cit/data/welcome.html Database Temporarily Out of Service
  National Estuarine Research Reserve System-wide Monitoring Program (NERR-SWMP) http://nerrs.noaa.gov/Monitoring/welcome.html Estuarine and near shore habitat condition, trends, and component analysis Ongoing NOAA   Initiated in 1995, currently 26 Reserves conduct water quality monitoring approximately every 30 min at at least 4 stations/Reserve.  Nutrient monitoring occurs at each of the 4 stations/Reserves on a monthly basis and a 24-hour sampling occurs at at least 1 of the 4 water quality stations/Reserve.  Weather conditions are monitored at at least 1 station/Reserve and sample multiple parameters on an approximately 15-30 minute sampling schedule.  Currently the NERRS is moving toward telemetry technology which will enable water and weather sampling on a 15 minute schedule.  Inital site implementation of telemetry will be completed by Fall 2006.  Reserve sites also have specific biomonitoring efforts that focus on Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) and Emergent Marsh vegetation communities, habitat mapping/land use and land change monitoring, benthic communities, invasive species (plants and animals), as well as plankton and nekton monitoring efforts.  These biomonitoring efforts vary depending on Reserve needs, however SAV/Emergent protocols are standardized across site implementation. Water and weather parameter monitoring occurs year round as environmental conditions allow for sampling (ie. ice cover, etc).  Biomonitoring efforts depend on individual Reserve needs. There are at least 104 water quality monitoring stations that report data regularly to the Centralized Data Mgt Office; greater coverage does exist within NERRS but is not directly associated with NOAA funding.  Biomonitoring efforts vary across the 26 reserves; currently there are at least 10 Reserves monitoring Emergent vegetation and at least 8 Reserves monitoring SAV with NOAA funded efforts. Abiotic Monitoring, Biological Monitoring, Land Use and Habitat Change; constant abiotic monitoring, cyclic biological monitoring. 1995 water and weather monitoring, 2004 initial biological monitoring efforts supported by NOAA funding Present Numerous water quality parameters and source-related variables including nutrients/productivity.  Habitat distributions, condition, land use change analysis and biological component analysis including GIS and satellite imagery. Estuarine waters in continental United States, Alaska, Puerto Rico and the Great Lakes. Prescribed methods for sampling water and weather/performance-based QA for all analyses Water temperature, Conductivity, DO, Turbidity, Water Level, pH, Salinity, Air temperature, wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, barometric pressure, rainfall, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), nitrates, nitrites, ammonia, ortho-phosphate, chlorophyll a, phaeopigments, (potentially: particulate N, particulate P, particulate C, TDN, TDP, TSS and silicate).  Land use change analysis including GIS and satellite imagery, mapping distributions of vegetation, characterization of habitats, etc.     Dr. Susan White  Susan.White@noaa.gov  301-563-1124 Network of 26 protected areas, at least 104 water quality stations and at least 26 weather quality stations, a number of Reserves also contribute to the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) and/or the USGS depositional sampling program--including mercury. Identify and track short-term variability and long-term changes in the integrity and biodiversity of estuarine ecosystems.   Data is available online at http://cdmo.baruch.sc.edu/ Data is available online at http://cdmo.baruch.sc.edu/ Reserve water and weather quality data is QA/QC'd before being uploaded onto the public website within at least 1 year of collection, individual Reserve data is available immediately from the Reserves given QA/QC disclaimers.  Biological monitoring data is currently available at the individual Reserves.
  National Marine Sanctuary Program A Monitoring Framework for the National Marine Sanctuary Program (http://www.sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/national/swim04.pdf) The mission of the NMSP is to serve as trustee for the Nation's marine protected areas to conserve, protect, and enhance the biodiversity, ecological integrity, and cultural legacy of these ecosystems. Fundamental to accomplishing the Program's mission is the development and consistent application of a rigorous, objective, and applied scientific foundatoin for understanding ecosystem structure and function, evalutating environmental condition, and implementing effective, sustainable, and adaptive management strategies. Monitoring programs not only address individual site priorities, but also regional and national issues and questions. Each of the marine sanctuaries established to protect natural resources has characteristics that make it unique as well as affect and control the way ecosystems function. However, the ecosystem structure and function in all sanctuaries have similarities and are influenced by analogous factors that interact in comparable ways. The three primary ecosystem componenets common among marine sanctuaries include water, habitats and living marine resources. Ongoing NOAA/NOS/NMSP with a substantial dependence on federal, state, and local governmental partners, academia, and volunteers, both for project funding and field support.   Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Assuming that a common marine ecosystem framework can be applied to all sanctuaries, a set of 17 questions has been developed that is widely applicable across the system of marine sanctuaries. Sanctuaries are asked to create much more specific questions at the local scale, however, these 17 "system questions" should be considered in the course of developing site-based monitoring programs in all sanctuaries. These questions are related to water, habitat, living resources and maritime heritage resources (see "notes" section for system questions). Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Water, habitats, and living marine resources. Water quality is, in general, monitored by tracking variation caused by natural drivers and indicators of certain types of human activity. The evaluation of both habitat and living resources requires assessment of the quantity and quality of resources as well as certain aspects of resource production and loss. Selected human influences must also be tracked, either through quantifying the levels of activities themselves or by tracking their outcomes (e.g., the occurrence of non-indigenous species). Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Key resource metrics includes marine mammal abundance, kelp canopy cover, seabird abundance, diversity, and mortality, krill biomass, coral and algae cover and diversity, growth rates, disease incidence, fish species richness and abundance, habitat disturbance, water temperature, light penetration, salinity, pH, sediment contaminants.     Kathy Dalton, Program Analyst, NOAA/NMSP, 1305 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, 301-713-3125 x267, kathy.dalton@noaa.gov, http://www.sanctuaries.nos.noss.gov Sanctuary Office Locations: Channel Islands: Santa Barbara, CA; Cordell Bank: Point Reyes Station, CA; Fagatele Bay: Pago Pago, American Samoa; Florida Keys: Marathon, Key Largo, Key West, FL; Flower Garden Banks: Bryan, TX; Gray's Reef: Savannah, GA; Gulf of the Farallones: San Francisco, CA; Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale: Kihei, Honolulu, Lihu'e, HI; Monitor: Newport News, VA; Monterey Bay: Monterey, CA; Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: Honolulu, Hilo, HI; Olympic Coast: Port Angeles, WA; Stellwagen Bank: Scituate, MA; Thunder Bay: Alepna, MI System Questions:
Water
• Are specific or multiple stressors, including changing oceanographic and atmospheric conditions, affecting water quality?
• What is the eutrophic condition of sanctuary waters and how is it changing?
• Do sanctuary waters pose risks to human health?
• What are the levels of human activities that may influence water quality and how are they changing?
Habitats
• What is the distribution of major habitat types and how is it changing?
• What is the physiological condition of biologically-structured habitats and how is it changing?
• What are the contaminant concentrations in sanctuary habitats and how are they changing?
• What are the levels of human activities that may influence habitat quality and how are they changing?
Living Resources
• What is the status of biodiversity and how is it changing?
• What is the status of extracted species and how is it changing?
• What is the status of non-indigenous species and how is it changing?
• What is the status of key species and how is it changing?
• What is the condition or health of key resources and how is it changing?
• What are the levels of human activities that may influence living resource quality and how are they changing?
Maritime Heritage Resources
• WWhat is the integrity of maritime heritage resources and how is it changing?
• Do maritime heritage resources pose an environmental hazard and is this threat changing?
• What are the levels of human activities that may influence maritime heritage resource quality and how are they changing?
  Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements. Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements.
  National Park Service - Vital Signs Water Quality NPS http://www.nature.nps.gov/water/VitalSignsGuidance.hym National monitoring program designed to characterize the current status and determine trends in the condition of park aquatic resources Ongoing NPS and Cooperators   To be determined by park Networks   Various Various New program   unknowm Unknown Unknown Various     gary_rosenlieb@nps.gov, dean_tucker@nps.gov (data) Park-wide     Various formats on website STORET  
  NOAA Marine Observations Backbone http://mob.ndbc.noaa.gov/ Sea state, wind, weather Ongoing NOAA   Periodic and Real Time na Hundreds - in different categories data distribution from moored buoys, coastal stations, Volunatry Observing Ship (VOS) Program, Deep Ocean Assessment and Reporting on Tsunamis (DART) buoy array Varies - Some start in 1975 Current automated buoy data, volunteer ship observations Coastal Marine, Deep Ocean, Tropical Atmospheric Ocean unknown sea surface/fixed depth/sub surface water temp,  wind profiles, water level, air temp and barometric pressure, weather observations, rainfall, dew point, water conductivity, current profiles, wave profiles, visibility, salinity     webmaster.ndbc@noaa.gov American Coastal Waters, Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean moored and drifting buoy arrays, volunteer ship observations   realtime data on website via internet realtime
  Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet) EPA  http://www.epa.gov/castnet/ Atmospheric deposition - Dry Ongoing EPA, National Park Service   Weekly average atmospheric concentrations of sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, sulfur dioxide and nitric acid; hourly concentrations of ambient ozone levels; meteorological conditions required for calculating dry deposition rates na Currently 97 active  Sites are co-located with NTN sites. CASTNET provides atmospheric data on the dry deposition component of total acid deposition, ground-level ozone and other forms of atmospheric pollution. CASTNET is considered the nation's primary source for atmospheric data to estimate dry acidic deposition and to provide data on rural ozone levels.  The network consists of 80+ monitoring sites that derive dry deposition based on measured air pollutant concentrations and modeled dry deposition velocities estimated from meteorology, land use, and site characteristic data.  1987 Present • weekly concentrations of nitric acid, nitrate, ammonium, sulfur dioxide, and sulfate
• hourly concentrations of ozone, and
• meteorological variables including temperature, humidity, wind speed, incoming solar radiation, and precipitation.
Atmospheric Deposition http://www.epa.gov/CASTNET/library/qapp_v2/qapp_app8.pdf sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, gaseous nitric acid, sulfur dioxide, pH, ozone, meteorologic conditions     Acid Rain Hotline:  202-343-9620 AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MS, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, OK, ON, PA, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VI, WA, WV, WI acid deposition is total of wet and dry deposition, dry 20-60%   data in website database via internet (#####)
  National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) / National Trends Network (NTN) http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/ Atmospheric Deposition of Acid, Nutrients and Toxics Ongoing EPA, NOAA, USDA, USFS, DOE, DOI, TVA, NASA, NSF, States, Tribes, Universities   precipitation collected weekly; 9 sites daily n.a. 200+ sites The purpose of the network is to collect data on the chemistry of precipitation for monitoring of geographical and temporal long-term trends. 1978 Present Deposition loadings are calculated through relating precipitation amounts and concentrations. Atmospheric Deposition (#####) hydrogen (acidity as pH), sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride, and base cations (such as calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium). Mercury     Van C. Bowersox, Coordinator
217-333-7873 
continental United States, Alaska, and Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
The National Atmospheric Deposition Program has also expanded its sampling to two additional networks. The Mercury Deposition Network (MDN), currently with over 35 sites, was formed in 1995 to collect weekly samples of precipitation which are analyzed by Frontier Geosciences for total mercury.    data in website database via internet (#####)
  Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/iadn/index_e.html               http://www.indiana.edu/~hiteslab/iadn/iadn.html Atmospheric Deposition of Toxics in the Great Lakes Ongoing Since 1999 the program is comprised of the following three agencies:

   1. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA)
   2. Environment Canada's (EC) Meteorological Service of Canada
   3. EC's Ecosystem Health Division of Ontario Region (EHD)
  At all master and some satellite sites, vapor and particle phase air samples are taken concurrently every 12 days for 24 hours. Precipitation samples are also taken and represent a composite over 28 days at US sites and 14 days at Canadian sites. Annual.   Since the goal of the project is to measure regional background concentrations of target compounds, sites removed from local
sources and representative of regional conditions were selected. IADN has been designed with one Master Station on each of the five Great Lakes, supplemented by a number of Satellite Stations to provide more spatial detail for deposition. The Master Stations offer the complete range of measurements made in the Network, measuring wet and dry deposition of Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) and trace metals. Satellite Stations may contain only a portion of the measurements made at the Master Stations.
1990 1998 Three types of samples are collected in this project: precipitation (rain and snow), airborne particles and airborne
organic vapors. 
Atmospheric Deposition - Great Lakes QAPP, revised in May, 2004 is at http://www.indiana.edu/~hiteslab/iadn/qapp00.pdf Covers wet and dry deposition                                                                                                                               See Separate Worksheet; IADN Analyte List       About 11, but plans for 17 Well documented program   CSV format Full Access0 Internet request at http://www.msc-smc.ec.gc.ca/iadn/Data/form/form_e.html
  NOAA The Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network ( AIRMoN Deposition Program) http://www.epa.gov/emap/nca/html/data/analyte.txt The Atmospheric Integrated Research Monitoring Network is an array of stations designed to provide a research-based foundation for the routine operations of the nation's deposition monitoring networks -- the  National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) for wet deposition, and the Clean Air Status and Tends Network (CASTNet) for dry. A subprogram is specifically designed to detect the benefits of emissions controls mandated by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and to quantify these benefits in terms of deposition to sensitive areas.                               The techniques of AIRMoN are designed to quantify the extent to which changes in emissions affect air quality and deposition at selected locations. Ongoing NOAA Air Resource Laboratory and cooperating institutions   Varies na 13 covering wet deposition, 7 of these measure dry deposition. Co-located with other NAPD statons Varies 1997 Varies, major emphasis on developing better estimates of ammonium levels in precipitation and determining the relationship of daily to weekly sampling. Atmospheric Deposition The NADP/AIRMoN-wet Quality Assurance Manual." Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL NADP parameters and others as needed                  
  Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends (BEST) Program http://www.best.usgs.gov/ T, HC Ongoing USGS   Varies 1992-Present (#####) FWS Lands: (one network using biased contaminant site selection, second network proposed to sample unbiased contaminant sites), Trust Species: (one network measures exposure and response of trust species to contaminants over time, second to describe contaminants and their effects in important habitats used by trust species)  1992 Present biomarkers, toxicity tests and bioassays, community health, and residue analyses FWS lands (primarily National Wildlife Refuges), rivers, estuaries, coasts DQ found under individual project metadata http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/data/best/search/metadata.htm contaminants, trace elements     James Coyle, BEST Program Project Chief, Fort Collins Science Center, jim_coyle@usgs.gov
Pat Anderson, BEST Program Staff Biologist, Fort Collins Science Center, patrick_anderson@usgs.gov
Mississippi River Basin, Columbia\Rio Grande River Basins, Yukon River Basin, Colorado River Basin, Pacific Coast (California, Oregon, Washington, Texas), Columbia River
BEST evaluates environmental contaminants and their effects on species and lands through applied research, monitoring, synthesis, and technology transfer.   online databases via internet (#####)
  USGS National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program USGS  http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ Pesticides, nutrients, VOC's, Stream ecology, trace elements, Transport of contaminants to water-supply wells, Agricultural chemical transport, Hg in streams, Nutrient enrichment effects on stream ecology, Effects of urbanization on stream ecology Ongoing USGS   Variable, ranging from continuous monitoring of physical parameters, to hourly samples over storm hydrographs, to monthly sampling at trends sites.  Much of the sampling is conducted to understand stream processes. 1991-present Hnudreds in more than 50 river basins across the Nation. Some fixed stations for detecting trends and loads. Fixed station network overlain by network designed to meet specific process-oriented study needs 1991 Present Physical Parameters,  Nutrients,  Major Ions, Trace Elements,  Pesticides, Suspended Sediments, volatile organic compounds, mercury 50 major river basins http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/xrel.pdf well features, field parameters (DO, pH, conductivity, temp), major ions, nutrients, pesticides, VOCs, trace elements, radionuclides and stable elements     Points of Contact: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sumr/04nr/POC.pdf Hundreds of sites, including fround water and surface water; basin sizes ranging from 1 sq mi to thousands of sq mi.  See http://infotrek.er.usgs.gov/servlet/page?_pageid=1713&_dad=portal30&_schema=PORTAL30&2862_RETRIEVE_DATA_2533437.p_subid=13938&2862_RETRIEVE_DATA_2533437.p_sub_siteid=47&2862_RETRIEVE_DATA_2533437.p_edit=0 for list of sites.     data in website database (see http://infotrek.er.usgs.gov/servlet/page?_pageid=543&_dad=portal30&_schema=PORTAL30); 2004 National Summary Report via Internet freely accessible at all times
  USGS National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) USGS  http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/ Nutrients, major ions, suspended sediment, pesticides, metals Ongoing USGS   monthly/realtime/fixed station 1974-1995 / 1996-2000 / 2000-2005 currently 41 stations; historically more than 500 stations; see http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/progdocs/stations.01-05.html fixed stations with data taken monthly fixed stations at major nodes collecting a range of chemicals (incl. pesticides and trace elements) in tandem with stream discharge/fixed station monitoring supplemented with a series of synoptic cruises 1974 Present Physical Parameters,  Nutrients,  Major Ions, Trace Elements,  Pesticides, Suspended Sediments  the nation's largest rivers--the Mississippi (including the Missouri and Ohio), the Columbia, the Colorado, and the Rio Grande/two basins, the Colorado and Columbia, and the Yukon River QA individually referenced by program/station?  http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/data/statsumtxt.html Temperature, Turbidity, Conductance, Dissolved oxygen, pH, CO3, HCO3, Alk (filtered, as CaCO3), Suspended sediment, Turbidity, NH3-N, NO2-N, Org+NH3-N, Org+NH3-N,  NO2+NO3-N, Total P (whole-water), Total P (filtered), PO4-P, DOC, Particulate Inorganic C, Total Particulate C, Particulate Organic C, Total Particulate N, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Sulfate, Fluoride, Silica, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Boron, Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Copper, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silver, Strontium, Vanadium, Zinc, Aluminum, Lithium, Selenium, Uranium, Propachlor, Butylate, Simazine, Prometon, Desethyl atrazine, Cyanazine, Fonofos, alpha-HCH, p,p DDE, Chlorpyrifos, gamma-HCH, Dieldrin, Metolachlor, Malathion, Parathion, Diazinon, Atrazine, Alachlor, Acetochlor, Metribuzin, Diethylanaline, Trifluralin,  Ethalfluralin, Phorate, Terbacil, Linuron, Methyl parathion, EPTC, Pebulate, Tebuthiuron, Molinate, Ethoprop, Benfluralin, Carbofuran,  Terbufos,  Pronamide, Disulfoton, Triallate, Propanil, Carbaryl, Thiobencarb, Dachthal (DCPA), Pendimethalin, Napropamide, Propargite, Azinphos methyl, Permethrin, Diazinon-d10 (%), Terbuthylazin (%), HCH alpha-D6 (%)     Office of Water Quality Chief, Tim Miller (703) 648-6868  see http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/progdocs/stations.01-05.html essentially three separate programs at different time periods 1974-1995 / 1996-2000 / 2000-2005   website database, 5 year summary reports;  see http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan/data/index.html via internet freely accessible at all times
  Monitoring and Event Response from Harmful Algal Blooms (MERHAB) NOAA  http://www.cop.noaa.gov/stressors/extremeevents/hab/current/fact-merhab.html HAB Ongoing NOAA, Regions   individual project based n.a. n.a. Provides funding for long-term monitoring of specific toxins in the food web, development of new techniques for HAB species detection, sampling protocols, ecological forecasting. 1997? Present (#####) (#####) (#####) (#####)     NOAA/NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR
Marc Suddleson
phone: 301-713-3338
e-mail: coastalocean@noaa.gov

(#####)     abstracts on website via internet (#####)
  National Streamflow Information Program http://water.usgs.gov/nsip/ Flows of water in rivers and streams Ongoing USGS and other entities   Continuous n.a. 7,000 Targeted Varies Varies - Many still current Water level Rivers   Stream Discharge, CFS       USGS Office of Surface Water 7,000 Sites Often associated with water quality stations   website database via Internet On Line
  National Wetland Inventory http://wetlands.fws.gov/                http://www.nwi.fws.gov/other/metadata/nwi_meta.txt Wetland location, extent, and classification Ongoing US Fish and Wildlife Service   Continuous n.a. n.a. Mapped inventory of boundaries Oct. 1981 Present Photointerpretation Wetlands  The attribute accuracy is tested by manual comparison of the source with hard copy printouts and/or symbolized display of the digital wetlands data on an interactive computer graphic system. In addition, quality control verification software (USFWS-NWI) tests the attributes against a master set of valid wetland attributes. Boundaries, wetland type     John Cooper, Branch of Habitat Assessment, Phone: 703-358-2161 n.a.       Arcdata and shape files Readily accessible Immediate
  Natural Resources Inventory                                              
  Monitoring and Event Response from Harmful Algal Blooms (MERHAB) NOAA  http://www.cop.noaa.gov/stressors/extremeevents/hab/current/fact-merhab.html HAB Ongoing NOAA, Regions, State/local/tribal monitoring agencies   individual project based project based variable Provides funding for long-term monitoring of specific toxins in the food web, development of new techniques for HAB species detection, sampling protocols, ecological forecasting. 1997 Present Variable and project specific e.g., discrete water samples, tissue samples, basic hydrography, nutrients, DOM, POM, in situ optical measurements, remote sensing data, instrumented moorings Coastal/nearshore waters, estuaries, Great Lakes, beaches Varies based on monitoring project and site requirements Project specific: e.g., nutrients, CTD, toxic organisms, dissolved and particulate toxins, in situ optical properties     NOAA/NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR
Marc Suddleson
phone: 301-713-3338
e-mail: coastalocean@noaa.gov

Coastal WA, CA, New England, mid-Atlantic states, Great Lakes     abstracts on website via internet varies based on monitoring project and site requirements